The FM Synth Sound and Where It Went

Frequency modulation produced tones subtractive synthesis could not, and it was almost impossible to programme.

One synthesis method defined the texture of eighties pop, and almost nobody who used it understood how it worked.

You can listen to our full playlist which contains the artist’s music, and know more about the artist’s work by scrolling down the page.

PLAYLIST

---

Modulating One Oscillator With Another

Frequency modulation synthesis defined the texture of a decade of pop, and almost nobody using it commercially understood how it worked.

The principle is simple to state. Take one oscillator and use its output to modulate the frequency of a second one. If the modulating oscillator is slow, you get vibrato. Push it up into the audio range and something else happens entirely: the modulation generates a complex set of new frequencies called sidebands.

Those sidebands are what produce the sound. Their spacing and amplitude depend on the ratio between the two oscillators and on the strength of the modulation, and small changes to either produce dramatically different results.

It Produced Tones Subtractive Synthesis Could Not

The reason it mattered is that the prevailing method — subtractive synthesis — starts with a harmonically rich waveform and removes content with a filter. Everything it produces is a subset of what the oscillator generated.

That makes certain sounds very difficult. Metallic timbres, bell tones, tuned percussion and electric-piano textures all depend on inharmonic partials that a sawtooth wave passed through a filter simply does not contain.

Frequency modulation generates inharmonic content directly, which is why it produced convincing bells, mallets and electric pianos immediately. Those sounds were suddenly available and instantly recognisable, and they saturated the era’s records.

Operator ratio is the parameter that decides whether a patch sounds musical or metallic. Simple whole-number ratios produce harmonically related sidebands that read as a pitched instrument; irrational ratios produce inharmonic content that reads as a bell or a struck object. That single control separates most usable FM sounds from most unusable ones.

Programming It Was Genuinely Opaque

The difficulty was that the relationship between the controls and the result was not intuitive in the way a filter cutoff is.

On a subtractive instrument, turning the cutoff down makes the sound darker. The mapping between gesture and outcome is obvious. On an FM instrument, adjusting a modulation index changes the harmonic content in ways that are difficult to predict without understanding the underlying mathematics.

Add an interface built around a small display and a membrane keypad rather than one control per parameter, and the practical result was that most users never programmed anything. They used the factory sounds, which is why so many records share the same handful of timbres.

The Sounds Became the Decade

Because the preset library was where nearly everyone stayed, a small set of specific patches became ubiquitous, and their ubiquity became a signature.

The electric piano, the bass patch and the tuned bell sounds appear across an enormous quantity of pop, film and television music from the period, to the point where they now function as a direct index of the era.

That is a slightly unusual situation historically. The characteristic sound of the decade was not a style of playing or an approach to arrangement but a literal set of factory presets shipped on one very widely sold instrument.

Velocity sensitivity is part of why those presets carried so well. Because modulation depth could be tied to how hard a key was struck, the timbre changed with playing rather than only the volume, which is unusual for a digital instrument of that era and is a large part of why the electric piano patch felt expressive.

Why It Disappeared

The decline was rapid and had two causes operating at once.

Sampling arrived and offered something FM could not: actual recordings of real instruments. Where FM approximated a piano, a sampler played one. For anyone seeking realism, which was most commercial work, sampling won immediately.

The second cause was saturation. The sounds had been used so heavily that they became a marker of a period that the next period was defining itself against, and they moved from contemporary to dated very quickly.

It Came Back as a Character

The return happened once the sounds had aged far enough to read as deliberate rather than merely old, which took roughly two decades.

Modern usage is different in an important respect. Where the original users mostly took presets because programming was impractical, contemporary producers have accessible software implementations with proper interfaces and use FM for what it uniquely does — aggressive, metallic, inharmonic textures that no other method produces as directly.

That is arguably the technique finally being used properly. The instrument that defined a decade through its factory sounds is now valued for the synthesis method those factory sounds barely explored.

Modern implementations also added what the originals lacked most: a visual display of the algorithm and the envelopes. Seeing which operator modulates which turns an opaque system into a legible one, and it is the single change that made the method teachable.

---

About The Author